This
is a piece I had written more than three years ago, but I do not recall having
posted it anywhere. In a way, then, it is safe to assume that this is a
re-post.
I have an abiding sneer on my face when I mention accountants, the
bean counters. My favorite assessment is they know the cost of everything but
the value of nothing. And, management people drill it into us, repeatedly, that
what cannot be measured does not exist. I have only slightly less contempt for
them. Their focus on numbers, to be fed into their Excel sheets, gets my goat.
But today I am getting a lesson on the virtue of knowing the cost,
some numbers, of at least some things. It is about a New York bill board, not a
commercial advertisement but something more akin to a public services message.
And, the way the message is displayed makes me hopeful that it will get through
some thick headed people, the global warming skeptics.
Some details: It is a 21 m wide message (you can view a photo of
the signage here [1]); located near Madison Square Garden
and Penn Station, a lot of foot traffic who can look up at the message and who,
hopefully, can take it in; put up by Deutcsche Bank’s asset management division
(a penance for the excesses of the
recent past?); shows green house gas levels in the atmosphere, on a global
reckoning in real time. If you accessed this [2] you may get a visceral feeling for what
we are doing to the atmosphere. The heart of the Earth is beating at rates that
will kill any living being.
I must confess to a middle-level awareness of issues of global
warming. Yet, the only numbers related to climate change that I can throw up are
387, 2, 450, 30 billion and 21. The current level of carbon dioxide
concentration in the atmosphere is 387 parts per million. This number increases
approximately by 2 every year. When the concentration reaches 450 we can say
good bye to living comfortably (another 30 years or so), no matter the capacity
of the air conditioners. 30 billion tones is the total amount of green house
gases we emit annually (weighted by carbon dioxide equivalence). And, 21 is
that equivalence for methane, typically from farming and animal breeding
activities. These are not enough to satisfy an accountant.
But, I have some more numbers for him or her, thanks to the bill
board. One is, 3.64 trillion, and the other is 2 billion. The first is the tons
of green house gases in the atmosphere. The other is an estimate of by how much
it will increase in a month at the given rates of consumption.
In Europe, environmental, particularly global warming, tracking of
automobile use is through GHG emissions per kilometer and these are beginning
to be mandated. Automobile manufacturers are forced to tweak their engine
design. Till now the common man had trouble reckoning his imposition on the
environment because nothing he did registered on the scales doing the rounds - annual
2 ppm increase in carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere. That sounded
so remote. But now his job has been made easy because the numbers are more
accessible. This is an instance of coming across meaningful numbers.
Even big numbers, when accessible, have a way of waking people up
(I hope). But, the results of a similar awareness raising campaign conducted
about 15 years ago in New Delhi do not offer much hope. That was when the
nation was inching close to the one billion mark in total population. A large
board in front of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, not as big as
the one in New York now, showed the total population number jumping up in real
time. And, it was given a royal ignore. What was worse was that when the
“official” millionth current citizen was born, the occasion was celebrated! The
government gave some “gifts” (I do not remember the details). It is to hoping this
does not repeat in New York: No “gifts” for the 10 millionth SUV.
It is my fervent hope that visitors to Penn Station and Madison
Square Garden glance up at least once in a while and see the numbers dancing in
front of their eyes. Perhaps we should have similar boards at airports, oil
refineries, thermal power stations, cement factories, meat processing plants,
construction sites, and places of energy intensive activities, first in the US
and later on in China, the West European nations, Japan, Australia, East
European nations, OPEC countries, Mexico, Brazil, India, and …
To conclude, the sneer on my face faded partially. I see numbers
as meaningful, even beyond the Excel sheets. Accountants and management people
are not evil incarnate, after all.
Raghuram
Ekambaram
References
- http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/jun/18/new-york-carbon-counter
- http://www.dbcca.com/dbcca/EN/;jsessionid=73FD487FCCDC4654B27E11E267F3849C.internet3
AGW, climate
change, Carbon emissions, CO2, Methane,
No comments:
Post a Comment