I
cannot lay a claim to even minimalist understanding of the spate of scandals
(in India, they go under the rubric scams) that currently overwhelm not just
the front page, the editorials and the op-ed pages of newspapers but also all
the other so-called inside pages. Therefore, you understand that anything I say
on scandals cannot carry much credibility; yet, I am exercising my right to say
what I want to say.
To
talk about scandals, the first thing I needed was a listing of scandals, and
there is always Wikipedia [1]. Now, please do not lecture me; I know Wikipedia
is not authoritative on anything, much less on something as nebulous as
scandals in India, many of which get swept under the carpet. But, there is
nothing wrong in taking it as the lower bound and that is what I intend to do.
There
are some inescapable conclusions from the list. Starting with the
not-so-important, I noticed that not all scams had a rupee values assigned to
it. So, apparently there is categorization. Monetizable
corruption and the others. Only 20 of the 40 plus listed under 2012 carry a
Rupee and Dollar number. This must be of interest beyond the fact that only
half the scandals have been monetized. What is the CAG doing, when it was so ready
with the eye-catching number Rs. 1,76,000 crores for the 2G Scam? In 2010 only
two of nine scams could be monetized!
CAG might counter that it has more important fish than Toilet Scam or Delhi
Surgical Gloves Scam to catch!
Going
beyond, I notice that the list uses a fixed exchange rate of about 54.94 rupees
to a dollar. Can this be applicable to the Cement Scam of 1981 – Rs. 30 crore
(USD 5.46 m)? Is there any rhyme or reason in the choice of the current exchange
rate? I suspect that Rs. 30 crore in 1981 was more eye-catching than Rs. 3,000
crores is in 2012. As far as I can see, there is no mention at the Wikipedia website that the amounts had been normalized to any year. My observation here is that the list does not seek to
enlighten, only to capture attention.
Coming
to the more important aspect, the list mentions only the year the affairs came
to the notice of the public and not the year of their genesis. For example, the
2G Spectrum Scam is listed out for 2010, but we know its origin traces itself
back some years. We have to bear this in mind when we reckon the annual-density of scandals, like 43 for
2012, 23 in 2011, 10 in 2010, stabilizing in single digits for a few years, then
for one decade and on down – 9 scandals between 1951 and 1989. These numbers
have to be taken with a pinch of salt as the Wikipedia list has some “named
scandals” in a box but surprisingly Nagarwala Scandal and Bofors (the ones with true
names!) are listed not in this box, but outside! I also may be excused for not being diligent
enough to avoid double counting. But, I am confident that the trend will stand
up to scrutiny even if the lists were put under a more rigorous scanner.
It
is from here we quickly conclude that we have reached the apex (or is it the
nadir) of venality in 2012. However, it is simply not the matter of politicians
becoming venal, but the political system becoming vulnerable. If you are as
cynical as I am, you may even want to say the system is designed to be
vulnerable.
There
is a rightful claim to the spoils of governance (a nice phrase isn’t it?) from
those outside the power-enclosure as it is for those within. The system is
tuned to serve all the potential power-holders alternately so that none loses
out. It is just that over time the entities demanding a share of the loot has
increased and also the number of deprived
among them. Therefore, it is necessary that instances of the loot be brought to
the notice of the public.
The
media get into the act. The list of scams grows. Bingo, wailing and breast-beating
by the so-called civil society, particularly the aam aadmi. Aam aadmi gives
rise to Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). The list
of stake holders in Governance Looting, in the Public Private Partnership (PPP)
mode, is like the Hilbert Hotel, never saying no to any visitor – there is always
a room in the hotel of corruption.
The
whole thing is a farce. It is not about corruption at all. It is all about democratic
looting. “You have had the opportunity. Now, it is our turn. I am ready with my
party. Bring on the elections!”
It
is, after all, democracy at work, in the service of corruption, scam and
scandals.
Raghuram
Ekambaram
References
1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scandals_in_India
No comments:
Post a Comment