I
have been a longtime subscriber of the London based newspaper The Economist. And, there are some side
benefits. Once in a while I will receive an email asking me to take part in a
survey, typically to assess the effectiveness of an advertisement campaign of a
bank, an insurance company etc. The bait used to be a free book – this is how I
have a library of three books from the stable of the newspaper: its style book,
a book on management and one on Wall Street.
All
books are good in some sense or the other. For example, even as I may not agree
with everything it says on the style of writing for the newspaper, the book
says it with style. But, alas, all good things have to come to end sometime or
the other. The free book bonanza has stopped and it is now a dollar donated to
a charity I favor, say UNICEF, Medecins
sans Frontieres, CRY … This too is good, at least for a moment of
self-satisfaction, smugness at no cost.
The
last such book gift I got was entitled Wall
Street, authored by Richard Roberts (ISBN 1 86197 464 7). I received it in
December 2004. And, shame on me, I read it only about a month back, eight years,
almost to the day since I received it. The book flew under my reading radar and
that must tell you how very nonchalant I am about money / finance and such,
obviously much to the detriment of my personal finance. Is that so?
Perhaps
not. The book, particularly Chapter 3 named Wall
Street scandals tells me that there was a chance I would have lost whatever
little nest egg I have now had I been an investor. Given my temperament I would
never have been a wise investor.
The
chapter, surprisingly coming from the mouthpiece of global finance, spreads out
the scandals, scams, corruption on Wall Street – individuals and institutions
that make up the US finance system. It was all a big con game, every scandalous
bit. Just take in what the chapter heading means in the context of the book –
the other chapters are named so prosaic: What
is Wall Street?, How we got here, Markets, markets, markets, The securities industry, Banking … you got the point. The only
dramatically headlined chapter is on corruption – “scandals” is the name it
goes under in the capitalistic system.
This
chapter is 30 pages long and the average for the other chapters is 15! In a
sense, in statistical terms, is it Six Sigma? Is it a Black Swan chapter that defines what the capitalist system is –
corruption institutionalized? Let me give you some interesting details from the
chapter.
Wall
Street began in 1896, more than a full century after “the US securities market
came into existence in the 1780s”. We do not know whether there have been any
scandals in the first century of this market. Let us assume in the negative.
Anyway, the book deals only with Wall Street as it has come to be in the past
106 years (the book was published in 2002), and as regards scandals, only since
1920s – not quite nine decades.
The
book, even if nothing else, is thorough and organized. The typology of the recent
scandals: auditors, fraud, professional conflicts of interest, underwriting.
The historical subset Common financial scandal
types includes bank advances, market ignorance and manipulation, rogue
traders, speculation, unsound financial structures. So you have them, the straitjackets
into which to stuff the scandals that get listed subsequently. And, there are
many.
There
have been 11 speculative manias (not including the securitization mania that
led up to the 2008 crisis), involving “cotton, coffee, land, silver, gold,
railroad stocks”. “By September 2001 nearly 300 fraud suits had been filed in US
courts against securities industry firms,” basically for leading the investors
astray. Then, Enron came along and in its wake Arthur Anderson, its auditors
and consultants too! Global Crossing, a large international fibre-optic cable
network company drummed up “the appearance of lively business by trading” with similar
companies with no money changing hands. The economics of bandwidth allowed
this. I recall someone, with tongue firmly in his cheeks, suggesting two people
exchanging ownership of houses to each other repeatedly to drive up the real
estate market!
The
failings of auditors came out strong when KPMG screwed up auditing Xerox – the time
reversed echo of what HP is going through now (and I am typing this piece on a
HP laptop! – conflict of interest, anyone?). Then, we have Tyco, Adelphi,
WorldCom. “Investment bank analysts had become salesman – of their bank’s
investment-banking services to their client’s stocks, both as IPOs and in the
secondary market, to investors.”
But
so far, I have not gone before 2002. Let me do that now, but try to be brief. “On
Wall Street in the 19th and early 20th century stock fraud
was not exceptional or even particularly reprehensible; indeed it was part of
the system.” This is precisely what led me to write in my
earlier post that, “[T]he system is designed to be vulnerable.”
“Most
of the leading figures of the era of the ‘robber barons’ and beyond – Rockefeller,
Vanderbilt, Gould, Drew, Fisk, Stanford, Morgan, Kennedy – made their fortunes
through shameless scams and chicanery.” Whew, what a list, and not a complete
one at that! Far surpasses the list of politicians currently on the dock in
India!
The
president of the New York Stock Exchange looted “the funds of … Exchange’s
Gratuity Fund, a charitable endowment for the widows and orphans of deceased
members, to the tune of $ 1 million [in the mid-1930s].” Again, time reversed
echo and at far off place, the Kargil war widow affair.
The
savings and loan scandal of the 1980s deserves a chapter by itself! I will give
it in two sentences: “Charles Keating of Lincoln Savings and Loan of Irvine,
California … ran the thrift into the ground, eventually costing US taxpayers
$2.3 billion in in deposit insurance.”
Well,
I have come to the end of this brief post. What I wanted to point out was that
if it is the politicians who drive corruption in India, a specious claim, as
the other side of the transaction is let off, it is the capitalists who do so
in the US, equally specious as the politicians are let off. Remember, the
narrative in the book stops on the far side of Leyman collapse and that would
have added a couple of pages in the book, making the chapter a blacker swan.
It
is a never ending saga. As far as there is capital there will be scams and
scandals and corruption. As far as there is politics, of the democratic kind,
there will be corruption. It can only be moderated / attenuated and never
extirpated, no matter what is claimed by the aam aadmi or the Aam Aadmi
Party.
Raghuram
Ekambaram
2 comments:
Isn't it the nexus between the politician and the capitalist that has driven corruption up the ladder? But we can't blame democracy for it, however. Weren't the kings corrupt too in their own ways?
My vote in the next elections is guaranteed for the Aam Aadmi Party. Why not give them a chance?
Matheikal, I would like to take issue with you here. Governance is not merely absence of corruption, very narrowly defined. What does AAP say about how the rules of governance are framed and who frames them? Unless AAP comes clear on these, even in the sense of an overarching framework, I would ignore it.
We cannot blame democracy for corruption, I agree. But, democratic governance seems to have been designed to look the other way. Please read my post prior to this one, on democratic corruption (I feel that you have done that and this comment arches over both; but, just in case you have not).
RE
Post a Comment