Religiosity and Conscience ...
...Don’t
go together.
To
me, religiosity is a feeling that goes beyond the marketplace type of religion.
One feels unmoored from everyday and mundane reality. If you are “afflicted” (word
used intentionally) by religiosity, you would not accept the religious
observances of even those in your “in” group.
In
some sense, the above is what happens to a drunk, on her first binge, and on
subsequent sessions. Once introduced and inured to drinking alcohol (liquor), the
brain seeks additional “fixes” – just as a drug addict does. The best joke I
heard before I even thought of taking alcohol was this: “How to avoid hang over
the next morning? Stay drunk!” Unfortunately, I was not wise enough to extend
the argument to religion!
Agreeing
with my thesis, encompassing the title and the starting line (together), would
be made easy if one agreed with the parallels I mentioned in the above
paragraph.
Religiosity
fills one’s basket of superstitions. Mangal ki mai, Shani ka chhaya, the
cutting words of an atheist in the Hindi film OMG Oh My God! are the
direct results of religiosity. You have to blame someone. If none is available,
blame yourself. Most importantly, do not ever blame God.
One
of my colleagues advised me against buying a two-wheeler years ago on a
Tuesday. He is a Punjabi and he said one should not buy metal stuff on Tuesday.
My retort to him, “I am a Thamizhan, and your thinking does not affect me!” It
so happened that I was involved in an accident, suffered a head injury, and
bled from my left ear, lost hearing in it, but not a scratch on my body
anywhere else. There were a few people who helped me survive that episode and
let me get on with my life, disability and all.
Was
this because I bought the two-wheeler on a Tuesday? You would never convince
me, because, I will throw this at you, “Then, why did I not die?” The responses
they could give are, “Your parents’ good deeds saved you!” or, “Had you bought
it the next day, you would have averted the accident!”
For
the first, I would argue, what else could my parents have done, being overly
religious as they were. No response. The second is counterfactual and meets a
dead end. The accident happened because it had to happen as Saturn and my birth
stars were badly aligned, or I bought the scooter on a Tuesday and on and on,
are the arguments of obscurantists.
What
your conscience does is to be discard religion and force you to analyze the
facts. No, I am not telling you that you would find the answer to whatever question
you asked if you did. To repeat, NO!
One
goes far as one can go. If one fails, take that in good spirits and this could impel
her to probe further, but a word of caution here: do not give into the
temptation to stop at some arbitrary point, a half-way house, and posit and
seek solace in the inane idea of an all-powerful entity coming to your rescue.
I, to my credit, was no less of a non-believer after the accident than I was
before.
Life
is full of coincidences resulting in good and bad things happening to an
individual. Que sera sera! This
is NOT resignation to fate, only the realization that you are still alive,
though disabled and incapable of doing some things that came naturally to you,
and you adjust to your current situation in life, this moment and the next
moment and so on.
There
is a lesson for those who bemoan ageing. What is the point? Now, you take 50%
more time for some tasks than before. Allocate the increased interval in your
schedule. Life is on a flexible time schedule. This is the greatest gift.
Conscience
is a personal trait, of a high order and wound up very tightly around one’s mind.
No one knows what mind is and where within it to find it, if it exists.
No one can define it for the others. Each and everyone needs to go on a search
individually, in all likelihood to lead everywhere (meaning nowhere). The
universe looks the same from every point in it. That is, each point is everywhere,
without any specificity, nowhere specific.
What
can an individual do is to reach out within oneself for individual definitions.
Of what?
You
define for yourself what is morally good and what is morally bad. No one else
can do this for you. Where individual moral conscience exists, there can be no
religion as it is external to you. Where religion exists, there can be no moral
conscience, only group conscience.
Hitler
may have been an atheist; the jury is out on that. Yet, German people were
Christians, at least some infused with hatred for Jews. These fell for Hitler. Religion overrode or
even totally erased their moral conscience, aided by the patent severity and
unfairness of the Treaty of Versailles. Similar perceived insults could
be said to have made religionists vicious during the Partition of India that
created Pakistan.
Yet,
you may discard your conscience and go religion on yourself. That is your
life.
From
when I was 28 years old, I am travelling on the Road from Damascus. Which
road, you ask. I have travelled on many and found that they all lead to one and
only destination. The realization that one defines herself merely from her acts
towards existence. You exist only through your essence. And, there can be no place for any religion
in that essence and outside of you.
I
rest my case.
Raghuram
Ekambaram
No comments:
Post a Comment