I
have a soft corner for Kamal Hassan. I get hints of a progressive mind even
given how deftly he hides behind all those make up tricks he shows off in his
movies.
I remember
to have read many years ago about his musing that he should have married his former
wife (which one you ask? Sarika) after the latter gave birth to her second
daughter (both with Kamal Hassan). To put it another way, why Sarika and he should
have avoided having a second child, after getting married (They could have gone
to Las Vegas, gotten a divorce, have the second baby, and then get married
again!).
His
logic was, by getting married between their two children, the first one, in the
eyes of the world (about which he seems not to care at all) would be
illegitimate, and the second, legitimate. He disliked this discrimination
between the two. That sounded quite logical and resembled some of the arguments
I had advanced about marriages and children in some other context. So, some
kind of kinship (one way, to be sure) between us was established.
But
that soft corner turned quite rigid in the aftermath of his support for the recent
bull-taming stir in Tamil Nadu. Lest I be misunderstood, I quickly add the following
disclaimer: I am not taking sides on this issue, not at all.
However,
till only about two days ago, I was wondering why Kamal was jumping into this
fray. It is not as if he upholds Tamil culture, in all its manifestations, sincerely
and so vigorously. Then came the blinding flash, yet clarifying the “why” of
his position.
Kamal
does not want anything to be banned. And, the example he gave was about banning
movies, which is bad; ergo, banning Jallikattu
is bad. Then, why is he not raising his voice against child marriage ban, Sati
ban ...
This
is what turned me off that man’s chain of thinking. Equating censorship of movies
and banning Jallikattu?
What
exactly is the free speech that Jallikattu
upholds? I ain’t got a clue. To be cynical, Kamal was using this stir to
validate his position on (which must at least in part be driven by profit
motives) mob censorship after the authorities have okayed a movie.
The
hardened corner is not diamond hard. If somehow I get to hear a satisfactory
explanation from him on this point, I would perhaps turn a softie.
But,
I know Kamal Hassan would not care about this rant from a nonentity and a self-proclaimed nonexpert.
Raghuram
Ekambaram
2 comments:
I think his thought process could have been guided by the fact that Jalikatu is not the only inhuman or inanimal (to be more correct) happening in the country. Let's be clear, dairying is an industry, and the cows and calves are a revenue unit. There is no need to say more on the fate of Gomata.
And, the bulls too, Balu!
But, Kamal really did screw up.
RE
Post a Comment