There
have been at least a few times when we read that a family from Nepal/Bangladesh/Pakistan/Srilanka/Myanmar and
perhaps other countries farther out in southeast Asia region had come to India
for getting treatment for one of its members in one of the hospitals in India. These
reports do not disguise the celebratory mood – look, people come to us for
getting treated! We are so developed and so good in health sciences and
healthcare practices! Add to that, we earned precious foreign exchange (to be
honest, not so precious). This is Type-I medical tourism.
Is
there a Type-II medical tourism? Yes, there is. The classification is based on
classes, with and without political/money power, with possible exceptions, of
which I can cite one.
Many
times we have heard about people in power, or with more money than they know
what to do with it, flying off to some western land to be treated for medical
conditions. Like M G Ramachandran many years ago, when foreign reserve position
must have been tenuous. Or, Sonia Gandhi, in the near past, when we were OK on
the foreign reserve front. Or, now when some foreign doctor came to attend to
the chief minister of Tamil Nadu, and who, I am sure, charged his fees and
expenses to our foreign reserve card. These are the Type II medical tourism.
Wearing
a cynical hat, I tend to think of this type of tourism as nothing more than
asserting one’s status. This may have nothing to do with availability of more advanced
facilities in foreign lands, or with more qualified foreign doctors, etc. We
are repeatedly told that healthcare services can be, in some cases are indeed,
provided across distances, tele-medicine being the name. The, why fly in those
doctors? To show, “these foreign doctors, I can order them around, can beckon them
as I fancy” etc. The possible exception was the instance of Delhi rape victim
taken to Malaysia.
Type-I
tourism seeks to maximize returns for a given amount of resources. India,
providing necessary level of medical care, is eager to oblige, while earning
foreign exchange and also some diplomatic brownie points. Type-II tourism
merely asserts, “I can and therefore, I will.” Apparently, no enhanced utility.
Type-I
is the real McCoy. Type-II is an imposter.
Raghuram
Ekambaram
2 comments:
Type-II is to prove that some mortals are more immortal than other mortals
Yes Balu, but the way it is going everyone is going to be more immortal than all the others! Now, that is a conundrum if you ever saw one!
Thanks.
Raghuram
Post a Comment