Learning Outside of Formal Education
That
is truly stupid of me. Education is education, the enterprise of learning. How
can there be a “formal” category, and its opposite “non-formal”? But, believe
me, there is one.
Sometime
in the 1990s, I wondered for long how Nescafe said that its instant coffee granules
are freeze dried. You get wet when you get frozen (or almost) at higher
latitudes in winter. Then, how can Nescafe freeze dry its coffee granules?
One
evening as I was sitting late in office and pretending to work, I suddenly
thought of the natural geyser in the Yellowstone National Park in the US. I
knew how the geyser erupts in about 90 minute intervals, give or take a few minutes. I
had heard about, analyzed and accepted the mechanism, superheated water bubbling
up through a column of water above that level, and spewing out a fountain of hot water
and steam.
I
merely asked myself what would happen if instead of heating the water, we
cooled it to very low temperatures. I knew the difference between boiling and
evaporation (unfortunately, our teachers of physics in my engineering
undergraduate courses, while explaining both boiling and evaporation did not analyze
them side by side to locate the source of the difference). If I were to tell
you that evaporation is a cooling process, you would come to me with your sword drawn out of its sheath.
Be
patient. You do say that water in the kettle heats up on its way to boiling.
Likewise, if only a little thought is directed towards evaporation, you would
find the water body cools. I will explain further.
All
the water molecules are not travelling at the same speed in the water body as
indicated by its temperature. Some travel slower, and some faster. The assessed
average is the temperature (why you need to keep your thermometer under your
tongue for two minutes). If near the surface, a water molecule moving at an
appropriate speed and angle with respect to the surface hits the boundary, it
would overcome surface tension forces and leave the water body, leaving it with
high energy of motion. Therefore, voila! the average temperature of the
water body reduces, it is cooled.
When
the wet coffee granules are put in a container and air is sucked out, the fast
moving water molecules are also released from the surface and out they go. The
temperature of the granular mass is reduced. Just keep the process on, ALL the water
molecules become sufficiently fast moving ones and are sucked out. Now, the
coffee granules are frozen and bone dry! This is the process of freeze drying!
While heat maybe added, in principle and if one had enough time, it is not
essential.
Now
comes the tenuous analogy with the Old Faithful. Some of the water (steam after
condensation in the atmosphere as the fountain shoots up quite high) seeps
through the porous sand around and occupies the vacated spaces at the top.
Water at the bottom of the column gets heated by the energy from the earth but
is unable to rise up through the water above. It gets superheated. When the
threshold is reached, the pressure above is no barrier for the superheated
water. The Old Faithful becomes newly and again faithful and erupts.
I
was asked by a faculty member whether ocean waves are longitudinal waves.
Immediate came my answer, “Of course not. They are transverse waves.” “Then,
why do we have waves coming on to the beach and receding? Shouldn’t the waves
be just like waves in a rope when jiggled?” That question must have stumped me,
but did not, as the detailed image of the waves formed in my mind, giving me
the necessary clue. No one had even mentioned this phenomenon to me till then,
honest.
As
transverse waves in deeper water propagate and approach the shallower waters
near the shore, they gradually take on the characteristics of longitudinal waves.
Voila! I have not only enjoyed waves
lapping at my feet and up to calf level, I also knew why they did that. I do
not know which physicist it was who boastfully remarked to his girlfriend that
he was the only one who knew why the stars shine, while sitting in a beach on a
chilly, clear night! Alas, no such luck for me.
It was said that if Richard Feynman were asked a question why such and such a thing happened, he would wonder how light would behave under those conditions. I have one situation where I was a faux Feynman! In a particular chapter in mechanics, as an equivalence of the phenomenon of refraction of light, I posed and solved a situation where a swimmer is struggling in water and a lifeguard is perched at a distance from the shore, but displaced sidewise from the swimmer. After giving all the required parameters, I solved the problem, stating first what the students have studied in high school about refraction of light: ratio of speed of light in two different media. I used the same principle in the problem posed and got the correct answer (students checked the answer using a different method.
In
a PG course, taking an explanation given in a book (referred by students only
for the problems it contained and not the explanations given), I explained the
concept of buckling of a rectangular plate with different edge conditions along
the loaded edges. I sketched the buckled shape using at least two differently colored
pieces of chalk. But, no go, with the students. All they wanted were equations.
Likewise I explained how the ratio of the sides affects the critical load. Same
response.
The
immediately preceding instance is one in which I did not take recourse to any
analogy or a possibly related phenomenon. It was purely analytical. What I
learned is no matter how and what the teacher teaches, students can look at the
material only through the prism of grades. Formal or non-formal does not matter.
But to soothe my own conscience, if I were to teach any more (zero chance), I
would not change. I am as adamant as the students are!
To
end this long post, it is my belief, only belief, that things learned
non-formally stay with you, and with the others through you, even if you are
not a teacher in an academic institution. Formal education leaves you when you
leave a strait-jacketed path. And, in my books, this scores higher.
Any
engineer, even after getting her MBA and is a well recompensed financial
analyst, looking at Old Faithful gush forth
high and mighty, would reach for her cup of Nescafe instant coffee!
Raghuram
Ekambaram
3 comments:
I too think that what I learnt non-formally has remained with me more loyally.
Thank you very much, Matheikal, for endorsing the post. You would, of course, accept that non-formal thinking returns a lot more meaningfully to people.
One of my friend commented, "perhaps one factor is that non-formal learning involves a deeper interest on the part of the student. when a person is engaged they're likely to remember the result much better."
"[E]ngaged" is the word that makes that comment powerful. I agreed fully and instantaneously. No hesitations whatsoever. I wrote back saying that I missed that factor. I am sure Mr. Matheikal's comment could be extended backwards to the same point.
In my own life, I read some topics way beyond what I was taught while ignoring other subjects in the syllabus. I wish I had realized this then, in high school. I studied Tamil grammar way beyond what was prescribed while ignoring prose and poetry. I fared very badly in that subject!
Such is life!
Raghuram Ekambaram
Post a Comment