And,
I did not when I was going to school.
I
learned my arithmetic at the cricket score table as published in newspapers
everyday of a Test match (excepting the rest day as the score box will not
appear on the day after). Of course, I am talking about the early 1960s.
Against
the line for every batsman the box will dutifully and diligently record the
singles, doubles, triples and the fours and the occasional sixes. It was my
compulsion, much against my father’s wishes who thought I found a nice way of
hogging the newspaper, to check out whether the numbers add up, line by line. This
obviously took time. It is how I got to be OK in arithmetic, focused exercise.
It
is in this context the column by Greg Chappell [1] opened my eyes. I came to
know from it how rare the sixes were those times, indeed earlier. One line from
the piece is enough: “Bradman went through his test career only hitting six
sixes.” Bradman was before my times but I do remember the glee I experienced
when we heard over the radio (slipping away from school to a friend’s house
that was very close) how Salim Durani hit one over the fences, straight long on
or off, 15 of them in a career of 24 Tests. Of course, as a batsman he was no
patch on Bradman. Yet, in sixes he reigned higher.
Coming
back to my arithmetic, I always had trouble with multiplication table for 3. It
is the cricket score box that set me on the right course. One can expect enough
number of threes, even against a single or low double digit score of a batsman
to hone the school boy’s ability to recite the multiplication table for 3. This
became a habit, to my benefit, I might add.
This
is what I miss in today’s cricket. Scoring three runs is as alien to batsman in
the ODIs or T20s as thanksgiving dinner with no turkey on the table. As Greg
Chappell says this might be due to “ever-shrinking boundaries” and/or “missile
launcher” bats. Or, it might even be better fielding techniques of the players.
Whatever it may be, I think this is bad for our school children.
There
may be many things I do not like about the shortened versions of the game,
including the cheerleaders in IPL matches, but my abiding complaint is about
the circumstances conspiring to deprive the score box of 3s.
Triples
are rare in baseball, but they do appear oftener than in today’s cricket. When
the ball ricochets off the wall in the corners, you can expect the batsman to
reach the third base. When the National Basketball Association (NBA) in the US
brought in 3-pointers (shot from outside), I was delirious. I knew I will never
lose my capability in reciting the multiplication table for 3! I am hoping ODI
and T20s will give me back the same pleasure. Our school children too, with or
without their calculators, computers, MS Excel, will benefit, I am sure.
Raghuram
Ekambaram
References
2 comments:
had made a comment here yesterday. did no register/disappeared. Anyway, I think batsmen of today DO NOT KNOw that 3 runs can be taken ! As you said shorter boundries ? or different field placements today? 3rd run was mostly taken by stealth - do players take less risk now a days?
Your highlighted reason seems the most correct, pala!
I have seen that by the time the ball reaches the boundary the batsmen are only half way through their second trot. I hate this. Any number of times I have heard on the radio the commentator saying that fielder is still chasing the ball when the batsmen turn around for their third. There was an excitement to three runs which is missing now even for a four to the boundary. This is not good.
RE
Post a Comment