It
is not too long ago I learned what “Enclosure Movement” meant. I may be wrong
on details but the thing goes like this: In the 17th century, in
Scotland and possibly in England too, public grazing lands were “enclosed” for
private use, for sheep grazing. This is how “property” came to be privatized and
in its wake came, “property rights”.
Over
time this “enclosure” movement migrated upwards, from land to air. This is one
way of understanding the tough stances taken by the developed and developing
countries as regards the “stock” and “flow” conceptions of carbon emissions.
The developed nations had “enclosed” the atmosphere and have let their
emissions flow out freely into the global atmosphere while retaining the “purity”
of their “enclosed” air since the time of Industrial Revolution (IR). To
understand this, please do imagine what would have happened to the atmosphere
in developed countries had we had some way of restricting airflows across
national boundaries. Their emissions would have stayed theirs.
And,
they demand that they should be allowed to leak out their further emissions in
to the global commons and the developing nations are balking. The parallels are
striking.
But,
in this post, I am not going to be talking about such “ethereal” matters when
it comes to issues of enclosure. Yet, it will be still IR, Indian Railways. Rather
I will be travelling from Delhi to Chennai, on rails, by the Tamil Nadu Express,
in an AC II Tier coach.
I
had always felt very uncomfortable travelling in AC coaches on Indian Railways.
The toilet situation is not a whole lot different in AC coaches vis-à-vis the
Sleeper Class coaches. Four space-disabled toilets (and one of them of the
western style with the seat wet and possibly dirty too at the beginning of the
journey) for about 70-80 passengers. So, I end up paying extra for nothing
extra, discount the air conditioning. But, the reason I truly hate AC coaches are the
drapes that hang down on the aisle side.
It
is a felt compulsion that people filing into their compartments pull the drapes
across behind them. The drapes stay drawn through the duration of the journey, across all
the compartments. OK, there is an extenuating circumstance: The drapes do not
hang on rings sliding across the rod. But, that is just an excuse. One could
always gather the drape to the sides and create an archway, a sense of opening;
not complete isolation. No, we cannot do that!
Why?
“We want our privacy. Oh, as per sun light, we have the windows.” This is a false
point of argument. What is true on the aisle side is equally true on the
windows side; the drapes cannot be drawn back fully. The sunlight that filters
through these half drawn drapes should sustain four human lives and the
assortment of insects and possibly a mouse or two! Quite an impossibility.
I
give below a few photographs. It is up to you to figure out which of these were
taken during night time (around 2 AM) and which during day time (around noon). You
take it on my word that I had not used any tricks to make things darker or
brighter. The exposure is “As is”, and taken at the shortest exposure time (without flash) that
would accommodate camera shaking, one twentieth of a second. There are a few
shots taken with the flash, just to indicate the brightness obtained even with
it, as the drapes are dark.
There
may be some clues, but the fact that one needs such subtle nods to discern
night from day is about as severe and indictment of railways enclosure as there
can be.
You
may notice that the aisle resembles a prison, a dark, narrow corridor and a row of
doors to the left and right.
The
sliding gate photograph, taken in the coach near the doors, is my metaphor for
the situation.
Here,
my complaint is about the notions of privacy and how it isolates one from
public interactions. Yes, when an individual interacts with the public there
will be instances of friction, but the opportunities for positive exchanges are
not foreclosed. Being afraid of tackling the former, one deprives oneself of
the possibilities of latter.
I
can vouch for it, by citing my two trips, down to Chennai and back up to Delhi
by Duronto Express, again AC II Tier coach. On the onward journey, my
compartment-mates were fully reticent, so much so that not much transpired
between the couple. On the return trip, my three compartment mates were associated
with the defence forces and I was the only civilian. And, we were a voluble
group. And, it was a wonderful experience, all of us arguing with, learning
from the others. There was a young lady an officer who in particular was so sweet
and silken smooth in her conversations, it was truly enjoyable.
That
tells me that the enclosure through drapes, in the overall reckoning, carries a
negative return. Indian Railways may think of diluting the severity of such
enclosures, and so too travelers in AC coaches.
This
must inform the current global talks on climate change etc. including the
differentiated responsibilities of the developed and developing countries.
There are no drapes in the global atmosphere.
Raghuram
Ekambaram
No comments:
Post a Comment