Friday, August 24, 2012

‘Sane’tized insanity


Anders Behring Breivik is sane, a panel of five Norwegian judges has pronounced. I have trouble with that.
It is an article of faith with me that when a human being takes the life of another, it is insanity that rules. I claim that insanity descends on a mind slowly and steadily. It is not like an instantaneous delivery from the “insanity stork”. Before anyone else points out, as a concomitant, I also hold that war is an act of insanity, no matter the events that lead to it.
To justify my position I have to take recourse to the work in progress of the concept of a cultural replicator, the “meme”, a memorable word coined by the redoubtable Richard Dawkins. Meme, as I understand it, goes beyond mere imitation, a cul-de-sac.  It is a replicator that in the main follows the principles of natural selection – reproduction, mutation, and differential survival.  
This second replicator came after the first one, the genetic replicator, had done its work too well to create its own potential Frankenstein monster – the meme which cares for its own survival, even if it be against the interests of its progenitor gene. Of course, if the gene (or, more plausibly, the gene pool that created the meme) becomes extinct, the meme (again, the meme pool) too will go likewise.
The tiger kills the antelope under the influence of its genetic replicator – the gene, being “selfish”, has to survive (I request the reader to understand the word “selfishness” in the context it is said – it is a “compulsion” of the chemical processes leavened by its biological consequences – genotype and phenotype). The tiger brain/mind, we surmise, had not given rise to the cultural replicator, the meme; its brain had just not evolved sufficiently. That is, to put it differently and in the context of the current discussion, the tiger brain is incapable of acting insanely, because it lacks the insanity meme.
The sub-species Homo sapiens sapiens is stuck with this insanity meme. As memes transmit culturally with the attendant increased infidelity as compared to that of the genes, the insanity meme cannot be un-remembered (that is, eradicated from memory of humans; going beyond individuals forgetting) as far as the human gene pool exists. What can at best be done is to promote alternate “sanity” genes in the infected mind. But the condition precedent for this is the acknowledgment that the mind has been infected – that is, Breivik is insane.
Breivik, unfortunately, has been found to be sane and this has been welcomed by the defense lawyers and there is no surprise there. In the absence of death penalty, being found sane confers a legitimacy that is unavailable to the certified insane (Death penalty equalizes the sane and insane, in more ways than one!). As a lawyer you would, I venture to speculate, welcome a sane client more than an insane one.
The decision has been welcomed by Breivik, and as above, there is no surprise here too. Going beyond, the judgment also imbues Breivik’s insane ideas of scare-mongering Islamization of the Norwegian society with sanity (Ask yourself: Can a sane person act sanely on his insane ideas? Or better, can he act insanely on his insane ideas and remain sane?). Consequently, the idea has a strong purchase on society’s thinking and norms. I am afraid of this, more because Norwegian people seem to have welcomed the judgment, which has come down on the side of political terrorism vis-à-vis psychosis.
It might even be that Hitler was sane, but it will indeed be difficult to convince anyone outside of the fringe neo-Nazi groups that he was sane. But Breivik has been found sane. The judgment has ‘sane’tized insanity.
This is dangerous. And, it is for this reason I would have welcomed Breivik to have been adjudged insane.
Raghuram Ekambaram


9 comments:

Aditi said...

If Breivik were judged as 'insane', would his sentence have been milder or harsher? He has shown no remorse, and media reported that seemed 'happy' with the sentence. Mere 20 years to a 35 year old to stay in a prison that has great amenities paid for by tax payers...amenities that law abiding and honest citizens in the developing world can not get in a lifetime... Am I glad that I do not bear the cross of liberalism..it is too heavy and pointless to bear for the likes of me.

shajanm said...

Dear Raghuram,

I have lost your logic on this one. This man Breivik could be called insane for all practical purposes, but what has 'memes' got to do with it?

-shajan

mandakolathur said...

No Aditi, Breivick is not going to see daylight forever. He would not have seen daylight even if he had been judged insane.

There is no comparison between what he "enjoys" in a Norwegian prison and the situation in the developing world. The comparison is completely invalid.

It is a question of how his act will be understood. It is something a sane person could and did do. This is what bothers the hell out of me.

RE

mandakolathur said...

Shajanm,

Then why wasn't he adjudged insane?

The meme is his ideas about invasion of Muslims into Norway to the extent that the country's "indigenous" culture would be run over. That is a pernicious myth, and that is the meme. It is no different than what Hitler said of Jews. By claiming that the meme had invaded a sane mind, other sane minds could be primed to receive the same myth, the same meme. This is what I am afraid of.

RE

dsampath said...

He has been punished as he was found sane..
if he was insane he would have been sent to an asylum and not get the punishment due to him.
sanity and insanity ls on the basis of the society's norms which is neither right or wrong but just a norm.An individual makes his own choice sometimes to go beyond the norm of the society .All break through developments in thought have come due to such "going beyond the society's norms.
So i welcome the judgement

dsampath said...

He has been punished as he was found sane..
if he was insane he would have been sent to an asylum and not get the punishment due to him.
sanity and insanity ls on the basis of the society's norms which is neither right or wrong but just a norm.An individual makes his own choice sometimes to go beyond the norm of the society .All break through developments in thought have come due to such "going beyond the society's norms.
So i welcome the judgement

Tomichan Matheikal said...

I really don't know where to draw the line between sanity and insanity. There are persons whom religions have canonised as saints but whose actions reek of insanity when compared with normal people's activities.

At any rate, a person who fails to learn anything 'good' from a whole lifetime should be considered insane unless he is mentally retarded!

mandakolathur said...

DS Sir,

His punishment includes a three room cell, a TV and a lap top computer without internet connection (the NYT story on the judgment). I do not believe it would be any more "luxurious" had he been found insane. And the asylum would have been in the same prison; indeed a wing was being prepared to make it an asylum had the judgment gone the other way.

Sir, sanity and insanity is NOT, at least in this case, based on society's norms. The first psychiatric profile painted him as psychotic whereas the second one found him sane. The judges must have bowed down to social pressures because ordinary Norwegians wanted him found sane. The fact is the judgment was not about he was guilty. This the accused owned up to, with pride!

RE

mandakolathur said...

Matheikal,

If you cannot draw the line betwwen sanity and insanity, you may try to assess the punishment based on its utility to society. Indeed, this is what my post has argued, saying an insane Breivik is better for the society than a sane Breivik.

RE