Anders
Behring Breivik is sane, a panel of five Norwegian judges has pronounced. I
have trouble with that.
It
is an article of faith with me that when a human being takes the life of
another, it is insanity that rules. I claim that insanity descends on a mind
slowly and steadily. It is not like an instantaneous delivery from the
“insanity stork”. Before anyone else points out, as a concomitant, I also hold
that war is an act of insanity, no matter the events that lead to it.
To
justify my position I have to take recourse to the work in progress of the
concept of a cultural replicator, the “meme”, a memorable word coined by the
redoubtable Richard Dawkins. Meme, as I understand it, goes beyond mere
imitation, a cul-de-sac. It is a replicator
that in the main follows the principles of natural selection – reproduction, mutation,
and differential survival.
This
second replicator came after the first one, the genetic replicator, had done
its work too well to create its own potential Frankenstein monster – the meme which
cares for its own survival, even if it be against the interests of its
progenitor gene. Of course, if the gene (or, more plausibly, the gene pool that
created the meme) becomes extinct, the meme (again, the meme pool) too will go
likewise.
The
tiger kills the antelope under the influence of its genetic replicator – the
gene, being “selfish”, has to survive (I request the reader to understand the
word “selfishness” in the context it is said – it is a “compulsion” of the
chemical processes leavened by its biological consequences – genotype and
phenotype). The tiger brain/mind, we surmise, had not given rise to the
cultural replicator, the meme; its brain had just not evolved sufficiently.
That is, to put it differently and in the context of the current discussion,
the tiger brain is incapable of acting insanely, because it lacks the insanity
meme.
The
sub-species Homo sapiens sapiens is
stuck with this insanity meme. As memes transmit culturally with the attendant increased
infidelity as compared to that of the genes, the insanity meme cannot be
un-remembered (that is, eradicated from memory of humans; going beyond individuals
forgetting) as far as the human gene pool exists. What can at best be done is
to promote alternate “sanity” genes in the infected mind. But the condition precedent for this is the
acknowledgment that the mind has been infected – that is, Breivik is insane.
Breivik,
unfortunately, has been found to be sane and this has been welcomed by the defense
lawyers and there is no surprise there. In the absence of death penalty, being
found sane confers a legitimacy that is unavailable to the certified insane
(Death penalty equalizes the sane and insane, in more ways than one!). As a
lawyer you would, I venture to speculate, welcome a sane client more than an
insane one.
The
decision has been welcomed by Breivik, and as above, there is no surprise here
too. Going beyond, the judgment also imbues Breivik’s insane ideas of scare-mongering
Islamization of the Norwegian society with sanity (Ask yourself: Can a sane
person act sanely on his insane ideas? Or better, can he act insanely on his
insane ideas and remain sane?). Consequently, the idea has a strong purchase on
society’s thinking and norms. I am afraid of this, more because Norwegian
people seem to have welcomed the judgment, which has come down on the side of
political terrorism vis-à-vis psychosis.
It
might even be that Hitler was sane, but it will indeed be difficult to convince
anyone outside of the fringe neo-Nazi groups that he was sane. But Breivik has
been found sane. The judgment has ‘sane’tized insanity.
This
is dangerous. And, it is for this reason I would have welcomed Breivik to have
been adjudged insane.
Raghuram
Ekambaram
9 comments:
If Breivik were judged as 'insane', would his sentence have been milder or harsher? He has shown no remorse, and media reported that seemed 'happy' with the sentence. Mere 20 years to a 35 year old to stay in a prison that has great amenities paid for by tax payers...amenities that law abiding and honest citizens in the developing world can not get in a lifetime... Am I glad that I do not bear the cross of liberalism..it is too heavy and pointless to bear for the likes of me.
Dear Raghuram,
I have lost your logic on this one. This man Breivik could be called insane for all practical purposes, but what has 'memes' got to do with it?
-shajan
No Aditi, Breivick is not going to see daylight forever. He would not have seen daylight even if he had been judged insane.
There is no comparison between what he "enjoys" in a Norwegian prison and the situation in the developing world. The comparison is completely invalid.
It is a question of how his act will be understood. It is something a sane person could and did do. This is what bothers the hell out of me.
RE
Shajanm,
Then why wasn't he adjudged insane?
The meme is his ideas about invasion of Muslims into Norway to the extent that the country's "indigenous" culture would be run over. That is a pernicious myth, and that is the meme. It is no different than what Hitler said of Jews. By claiming that the meme had invaded a sane mind, other sane minds could be primed to receive the same myth, the same meme. This is what I am afraid of.
RE
He has been punished as he was found sane..
if he was insane he would have been sent to an asylum and not get the punishment due to him.
sanity and insanity ls on the basis of the society's norms which is neither right or wrong but just a norm.An individual makes his own choice sometimes to go beyond the norm of the society .All break through developments in thought have come due to such "going beyond the society's norms.
So i welcome the judgement
He has been punished as he was found sane..
if he was insane he would have been sent to an asylum and not get the punishment due to him.
sanity and insanity ls on the basis of the society's norms which is neither right or wrong but just a norm.An individual makes his own choice sometimes to go beyond the norm of the society .All break through developments in thought have come due to such "going beyond the society's norms.
So i welcome the judgement
I really don't know where to draw the line between sanity and insanity. There are persons whom religions have canonised as saints but whose actions reek of insanity when compared with normal people's activities.
At any rate, a person who fails to learn anything 'good' from a whole lifetime should be considered insane unless he is mentally retarded!
DS Sir,
His punishment includes a three room cell, a TV and a lap top computer without internet connection (the NYT story on the judgment). I do not believe it would be any more "luxurious" had he been found insane. And the asylum would have been in the same prison; indeed a wing was being prepared to make it an asylum had the judgment gone the other way.
Sir, sanity and insanity is NOT, at least in this case, based on society's norms. The first psychiatric profile painted him as psychotic whereas the second one found him sane. The judges must have bowed down to social pressures because ordinary Norwegians wanted him found sane. The fact is the judgment was not about he was guilty. This the accused owned up to, with pride!
RE
Matheikal,
If you cannot draw the line betwwen sanity and insanity, you may try to assess the punishment based on its utility to society. Indeed, this is what my post has argued, saying an insane Breivik is better for the society than a sane Breivik.
RE
Post a Comment