This
time when the sword was about to drop when Lance Armstrong, who was sitting under it, was smart enough to escape. Not so smart or lucky were the high profile Ben Johnson and
Marion Jones.
I
do not hero worship, even as I adore the exploits – those that I can, if not
understand, at least feel amazed at – of some people. In sports, beyond cricket
(Garfield Sobers), tennis (John McEnroe), diving (Greg Louganis), golf (Tom
Watson and Severiano Ballesteros) – you would observe that my heroes, except
for Sobers, occupy a small time window – I confer my hero status to the one and
only Greg Lemond, the cyclist. He won the Tour three times.
But,
that is not the reason he is my cycling hero. The Spaniard Miguel Indurain had after
all won the Tour five successive years and was a certified hero in Europe. Yet,
Lemond’s last day heroics, one of the few times the Tour ended on an individual
Time Trial stage, of beating Laurent Fignon (sounded more like Filet Mignon!) in
1989 by eight seconds. Take that, after twenty plus days of grueling tour
across France and northern Spain, the difference was a mere eight seconds! That
clinched Greg Lemond’s hero status in my book. He beat his rival in his rival’s
homeland. That added to his mystique.
Then
came Lance Armstrong, another American, and his seven Tour victories. And, I had
long resented that Lance Armstrong had usurped the position rightfully held by
my hero. OK, there was a human-interest side to the legend of Armstrong – he being
a cancer survivor. But, I resented his Tour exploits. And, so did the French.
As
an aside, the French did not embrace Greg, in my opinion, as gracefully as they
should have. Though the French gifted the Lady in the Harbor to the US, that
warm feeling had evaporated over time.
Coming
back to Armstrong, there had been suspicions galore that he had used
performance enhancing drugs to win the Tours. In normal parlance, this meant
that his victories were “tainted”. But nothing could be proved. And, nothing
has been proved yet. That is why the US authorities were contemplating
arbitration proceedings against Armstrong. The single hair from the tail of a
horse by which the sword was hanging was thinning.
But
Armstrong will not let the sword fall. He came clean, but not so clean. He almost admitted that he cheated but said that he did not cheat. It is precisely like our
politician’s apology: “If I have offended you, I did not do it intentionally. I, hmm, ... err ... sorry!”
But, this does not concern me much.
What
I am happy about is Greg Lemond is back on top. It is almost like how Carl
Lewis won his Gold Medal in 100 m sprint at the Seoul Olympics after Ben
Johnson was stripped of his victory. But, there is a huge difference between
Lewis and Lemond, and on that later.
For
now, I am enjoying that people will hear more about Greg Lemond (courtesy me
and this post for a start?) and less about Lance Armstrong.
Raghuram Ekambaram
2 comments:
With or without dope, Lance Armstrong is many a cancer patients hope, so I say damn the USDA verdict
Balu, that is the other side of the coin ... but, I kind of lean towards "ends do not justify the means" type ...
RE
Post a Comment