Religious Tourism and Redevelopment of Railway
Stations
If
you stepped out of Srirangam Railway Station and tripped over something, you
would land at the apartment building in which I reside. The station falls on
the chord line between Chennai and stations further south like Tiruchirappalli,
Madurai and on down.
Srirangam
is one of the nine stations in Southern Railway that have been redeveloped
under and as part of Amrit Bharat Station Scheme (ABSS) implemented
across India. The other stations are: St. Thomas Mount (within the limits of
the suburban trains from Chennai), Samalpatti, Chidambaram, Tiruvannamalai,
Mannargudi, Vriddhachalam, Polur, Kulitturai. Out of the above, I can identify
four stations as anchoring the travel plans of devotees: Chidambaram and
Tiruvannamalai (both Saivite), Srirangam and Mannargudi (both Vaishnavite).
Polur, only about 30 km from Tiruvannamalai, could become its suburb in a
couple of decades, thanks to ribbon development.
By
the way, ribbon development is not anywhere a new concept. Kanchipuram used to
have two distinct areas, earmarked as the Big Kanchipuram and the Little
Kanchipuram. These two were connected, and I am not joking, a ribbon thin
urban marketplace! The irony is the Pallava dynasty had its own central vista,
on the western limits of the Big Kanchipuram!
I
do not know about the choice of the other three stations out of the nine, but I
suspect they too have strong religious significance. For example, St. Thomas
Mount, named a National Shrine in 2010. That is, we can somewhat confidently
say that the redeveloped stations in Tamil Nadu have a strong religious flavour.
In
a recent post I have argued that the architect who was involved in Srirangam
station redevelopment was in a way colour blind. My point still stands, no
matter it has been anointed by Mr. Modi. Now, I would like to bring another
point, about the same station. The railway line marks the municipal limits of
Srirangam on the west side, and of Tiruvanaikovil on the east. I am OK with an unhyphenated (hyphenated as in
Srirangam−Tiruvanaikovil) name Srirangam for the station. Yet, the station
could have been provided with another entry/exit facility, along with a ticket
counter on the Tiruvanaikovil side.
As
it stands, people from Tiruvanaikovil have to negotiate a Road Overbridge (RoB)
across the tracks to reach the station, adding perhaps more than a kilometre to
the distance and about Rs. 50/− to the three-wheeler fare. Also, a two-wheeler
parking lot would be of great help to the public, which can divert some of the
revenue from the Srirangam side. There is enough space on the east side of the
tracks for the above; I know as my evening walks sometimes take me there, which
I get to by going across a level crossing. Train travellers seem not to have
been consulted. Again, top-down decision making, the modus operandi of
GoI.
I
would also point out something about Tiruvannamalai station redevelopment. It
is somewhat on the periphery of and at about 2 km (about 25-30 minutes walking
time) from the main attraction of the town, Arunachaleswarar Temple. Could the
railway authorities not have adjusted the rail line, and also the station,
closer to the temple? Of course, cost. But, it could have been absorbed within
the services heading.
While
on this topic, I would also mention Kanchipuram. Why that station has not been
redeveloped? The reason could be that within the past two to three decades, the
station has been shunted out from the then eastern (of one part of the town; the
eastern part has been extended further east) to the southern fringes of the
whole town. For the deities of Kanchipuram to go again with begging bowls to
the Southern Railway authorities would have been unseemly! Kanchipuram lost out
due to its embarrassment of riches – too many major deities! The same fate was
visited upon the other highly venerated temple town, Kumbakonam!
That
takes me to the end of this post, looking a gift horse in the mouth. The
horses, like Kumbakonam, Kanchipuram are too long in their teeth! Therefore, I
stop.
Raghuram
Ekambaram
No comments:
Post a Comment